Emma Weizenbaum

839 citations
16 papers · 412 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Emma Weizenbaum

16 papers receiving 400 citations

Peers

Emma Weizenbaum
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 222
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 64
  • Neurology 71
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 81
  • Medical Terminology 1
Replace Daniel Whibley with:
Daniel Whibley United States
Ruth Deck Germany
Zvia Rudich Israel
Allan P. Shapiro Canada
Lucy A. Epstein United States
Kamila Osypiuk United States
Ashley M. Henneghan United States
Joanie Thelen United States
Marcella Ottonello Italy
Valeria Caponnetto Italy
Emma Weizenbaum relative to Daniel Whibley United States Daniel Whibley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
Daniel Whibley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Weizenbaum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Weizenbaum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Weizenbaum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Weizenbaum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Weizenbaum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Weizenbaum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Weizenbaum. The network helps show where Emma Weizenbaum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Weizenbaum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Weizenbaum Line = papers co-authored together Emma Weizenbaum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2013124
2 202048
3 201339
4 201835
5 201533
6 202127
7 202323
8 201620
9 201415
10 202314
11 202312
12 201810
13 20217
14 20252
15 20222
16 20231

About Emma Weizenbaum

Emma Weizenbaum is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 16 papers that have together received 412 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (6 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (5 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers), Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging (3 papers), Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies (2 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (2 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (1 paper) and Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (222 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (64 citations), Neurology (71 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (81 citations) and Medical Terminology (1 citation). Emma Weizenbaum has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth Loder, Benjamin Frishberg, Stephen D. Silberstein, Daniel Fulford, John Torous, Paul Rizzoli, Alice Cronin‐Golomb, Edward R. Laws, Robert D. Salazar and Terry D. Ellis. Their work appears in journals such as Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain, Alzheimer s & Dementia, Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring, JMIR mhealth and uhealth and The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact