Joanie Thelen

29 papers receiving 459 citations

Peers

Joanie Thelen
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 182
  • Applied Psychology 27
  • Clinical Psychology 86
  • Family Practice 7
  • General Decision Sciences 6
Replace Sharon A. Mudd with:
Sharon A. Mudd United States
Eben S. Schwartz United States
Marie‐Claire Gay France
Mariela C. Shirley United States
Donna Czarnecki United States
V. Günther Austria
Sarah Kinsinger United States
Martina Borghi Italy
Pier Maria Furlan Italy
Rudolf Gregurek Croatia
Joanie Thelen relative to Sharon A. Mudd United States Sharon A. Mudd's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Sharon A. Mudd · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joanie Thelen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joanie Thelen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joanie Thelen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joanie Thelen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joanie Thelen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joanie Thelen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joanie Thelen. The network helps show where Joanie Thelen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joanie Thelen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joanie Thelen Line = papers co-authored together Joanie Thelen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201760
2 201454
3 202047
4 201839
5 201736
6 202034
7 202128
8 201522
9 202020
10 201819
11
Polypharmacy in Multiple Sclerosis: Current Knowledge and Future Directions.
202119
12 201918
13 202016
14 201913
15 202011
16 201711
17 201511
18 201810
19 20198
20 20196

About Joanie Thelen

Joanie Thelen is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Epidemiology, Clinical Psychology, Pharmacology and Neurology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 504 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (12 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (9 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (2 papers), Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases (1 paper), Resilience and Mental Health (1 paper), Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research (1 paper), Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects (1 paper) and Polyomavirus and related diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (182 citations), Applied Psychology (27 citations), Clinical Psychology (86 citations), Family Practice (7 citations) and General Decision Sciences (6 citations). Joanie Thelen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jared M. Bruce, Sharon Lynch, Amanda S. Bruce, Delwyn Catley, Lauren B. Strober, David P. Jarmolowicz, Laura M. Hancock, Seung-Lark Lim, Cristina A F Román and Peter A. Arnett. Their work appears in journals such as Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, British Journal of Sports Medicine, Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact