Elizabeth Loder
Impact in
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.1%
- Migraine and Headache Studies
- Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Medical Terminology top 0.5%
Papers in
-
- Migraine and Headache Studies 105
-
- Healthcare cost, quality, practices 27
- Co-authors
- Josephine Mauskopf (27 shared papers)Federico Augustovski (27 shared papers)Don Husereau (27 shared papers)Dan Greenberg (27 shared papers)Andrew Briggs (27 shared papers)Chris Carswell (27 shared papers)Stavros Petrou (25 shared papers)Rebecca Burch (18 shared papers)
- Journals
- Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain (57 papers)BMJ (14 papers)Cephalalgia (12 papers)Neurology (5 papers)Value in Health (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Elizabeth Loder
167 papers receiving 15.2k citations
Elizabeth Loder's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 171
- Psychiatry and Mental health 4.3k
- Medical Terminology 21
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.4k
- Physiology 1.3k
- Sensory Systems 230
Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth Loder
This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth Loder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth Loder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth Loder more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth Loder
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth Loder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth Loder. The network helps show where Elizabeth Loder may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Elizabeth Loder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 177 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Using Mendelian Randomization Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 2161 |
| 2 | Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 1571 |
| 3 | Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 1445 |
| 4 | Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using mendelian randomisation (STROBE-MR): explanation and elaboration Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 944 |
| 5 | Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) Statement: Updated Reporting Guidance for Health Economic Evaluations Hit paper breakdown → | 2022 | 550 |
| 6 | Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) Statement Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 510 |
| 7 | Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR CHEERS II Good Practices Task Force Hit paper breakdown → | 2022 | 466 |
| 8 | CONSOLIDATED HEALTH ECONOMIC EVALUATION REPORTING STANDARDS (CHEERS) STATEMENT Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 416 |
| 9 | The Prevalence and Burden of Migraine and Severe Headache in the Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 404 |
| 10 | The Prevalence and Impact of Migraine and Severe Headache in the United States: Figures and Trends From Government Health Studies Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 367 |
| 11 | 2013 | 359 | |
| 12 | 2006 | 338 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 317 | |
| 14 | Guidelines for the Content of Statistical Analysis Plans in Clinical Trials Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 281 |
| 15 | Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 280 |
| 16 | Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations Hit paper breakdown → | 2022 | 234 |
| 17 | Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations Hit paper breakdown → | 2022 | 218 |
| 18 | 2013 | 187 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 186 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 180 |
About Elizabeth Loder
Elizabeth Loder is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Economics and Econometrics and Physiology, having authored 177 papers that have together received 15.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migraine and Headache Studies (105 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (27 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (26 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (24 papers), Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments (22 papers), Sympathectomy and Hyperhidrosis Treatments (19 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (9 papers) and Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (4.3k citations), Medical Terminology (21 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.4k citations), Physiology (1.3k citations) and Sensory Systems (230 citations). Elizabeth Loder has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Josephine Mauskopf, Federico Augustovski, Don Husereau, Dan Greenberg, Andrew Briggs, Chris Carswell, Stavros Petrou, Rebecca Burch, Michael Drummond and David Moher. Their work appears in journals such as Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain, BMJ, Cephalalgia, Neurology and Value in Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.