Emma Watson

505 citations
24 papers · 332 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Emma Watson

21 papers receiving 313 citations

Peers

Emma Watson
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • General Health Professions 197
  • Speech and Hearing 47
  • Public Administration 20
  • Clinical Psychology 83
  • Education 79
Replace Rebecca Nixdorf with:
Rebecca Nixdorf Germany
Julia Terry United Kingdom
Joseph Duffy United Kingdom
Noel Renouf Australia
Nicole Fedoravicius United States
Doug Marty United States
Deborah Bybee United States
Tara Louise Dimopoulos-Bick Australia
Mardi Daley Canada
Anne D. Kuppinger United States
Emma Watson relative to Rebecca Nixdorf Germany Rebecca Nixdorf's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.8×
Rebecca Nixdorf · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Watson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Watson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Watson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Watson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Watson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Watson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Watson. The network helps show where Emma Watson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Emma Watson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Watson Line = papers co-authored together Emma Watson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017162
2 202037
3 201234
4 201220
5 202311
6 202411
7 202211
8 20148
9 20167
10 20126
11 20175
12 20143
13 20243
14 20243
15 20142
16 20162
17 20132
18 20252
19 20141
20 20241

About Emma Watson

Emma Watson is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Speech and Hearing, Public Administration, Education and Clinical Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (21 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (13 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (7 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (6 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (2 papers) and Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (197 citations), Speech and Hearing (47 citations), Public Administration (20 citations), Clinical Psychology (83 citations) and Education (79 citations). Emma Watson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Julie Repper, Kim Jørgensen, Bengt Karlsson, Karen Machin, Caroline Fox Yeo, Sara Meddings, Yasmin Ali, Rose McGranahan, Morten T. Hansen and Merete Bender Bjerrum. Their work appears in journals such as Nursing Inquiry, Journal of Mental Health, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, Qualitative Health Research and International Journal of Social Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact