Emma Warr
Impact in
- Insect Science top 1%
- Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
- Insect and Pesticide Research
- Immunology top 5%
- Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms
Papers in
-
- Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms 7
-
- Insect Resistance and Genetics 4
- Co-authors
- George Dimopoulos (6 shared papers)Yuemei Dong (4 shared papers)Ruth Aguilar (3 shared papers)Zhiyong Xi (1 shared paper)Emmanuel Mongin (1 shared paper)Hilary Hurd (4 shared papers)Anthony Polwart (1 shared paper)Andrew Steven (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Insect Molecular Biology (2 papers)BMC Genomics (2 papers)Acta Tropica (1 paper)Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (1 paper)PLoS Pathogens (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
Emma Warr
11 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Insect Science 484
- Immunology 429
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 518
- Parasitology 51
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 85
Countries citing papers authored by Emma Warr
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Warr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Warr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Warr more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Warr
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Warr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Warr. The network helps show where Emma Warr may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Warr, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 353 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 263 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 86 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 71 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 68 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 68 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 42 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 37 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 27 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 9 |
About Emma Warr
Emma Warr is a scholar working on Immunology, Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Insect Science and Ecology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms (7 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (4 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (4 papers), Malaria Research and Control (3 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (3 papers), Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (2 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (1 paper) and Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (484 citations), Immunology (429 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (518 citations), Parasitology (51 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (85 citations). Emma Warr has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include George Dimopoulos, Yuemei Dong, Ruth Aguilar, Zhiyong Xi, Emmanuel Mongin, Hilary Hurd, Anthony Polwart, Andrew Steven, Sara N. Mitchell and Pie Müller. Their work appears in journals such as Insect Molecular Biology, BMC Genomics, Acta Tropica, Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and PLoS Pathogens.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.