Countries where authors publish in Physical Therapy Reviews
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Physical Therapy Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Physical Therapy Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Physical Therapy Reviews more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Physical Therapy Reviews
This network shows the impact of papers published in Physical Therapy Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Physical Therapy Reviews.
About Physical Therapy Reviews
The 976 papers published in Physical Therapy Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 10.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Physical Therapy Reviews usually cover Rehabilitation (144 papers), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (141 papers), Occupational Therapy (64 papers), Pharmacology (250 papers) and Family Practice (21 papers) specifically the topics of Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (248 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (113 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (93 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (92 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (77 papers), Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (60 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (54 papers) and Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (51 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Physical Therapy Reviews are G. Lorimer Moseley, Nadine E. Foster, Joshua A. Cleland, Max Zusman, Tim Watson, Jonathan M. Williams, David J. Magee, Sharon Warren, Alejandro Galán-Mercant and Susan Armijo‐Olivo.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.