Kathryn E. Ringland

49 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Kathryn E. Ringland
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Human-Computer Interaction 282
  • Occupational Therapy 149
  • Applied Psychology 181
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 63
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 366
Replace Anna Williams with:
Anna Williams United States
Christina Harrington United States
Jason Yip United States
Yavuz İnal Norway
Arpita Bhattacharya United States
Inmaculada Fajardo Spain
Jayne Wallace United Kingdom
Devva Kasnitz United States
Karen Guldberg United Kingdom
Lindsay Reynolds United States
Kathryn E. Ringland relative to Anna Williams United States Anna Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.5×
Anna Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kathryn E. Ringland

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kathryn E. Ringland's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathryn E. Ringland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathryn E. Ringland more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kathryn E. Ringland

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathryn E. Ringland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathryn E. Ringland. The network helps show where Kathryn E. Ringland may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kathryn E. Ringland, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kathryn E. Ringland Line = papers co-authored together Kathryn E. Ringland links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201687
2 202180
3 201571
4 201669
5 202053
6 201553
7 201450
8 201946
9 202144
10 201943
11 201541
12 201932
13 201931
14 202329
15 201929
16 202128
17 201926
18 201725
19 201922
20 202018

About Kathryn E. Ringland

Kathryn E. Ringland is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science, Applied Psychology and Demography, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (18 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (16 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (8 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (8 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (7 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (6 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (6 papers) and Interactive and Immersive Displays (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (282 citations), Occupational Therapy (149 citations), Applied Psychology (181 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (63 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (366 citations). Kathryn E. Ringland has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Gillian R. Hayes, Christine T. Wolf, LouAnne Boyd, Anne Marie Piper, Lynn Dombrowski, Madhu Reddy, Heather Faucett, Maitraye Das, John Tang and Oliver L. Haimson. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and interactions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact