Emma Johnson
Impact in
-
- Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Papers in
- Surgery 4
- Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes 4
- Hip disorders and treatments 1
-
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement 2
- Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout 1
- Employment and Welfare Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Rachael Gooberman‐Hill (7 shared papers)Jeremy Horwood (5 shared papers)Ashley Blom (3 shared papers)Elsa Marques (3 shared papers)Olga Idriss Davis (1 shared paper)Crista E. Johnson‐Agbakwu (1 shared paper)Roseanne C. Schuster (1 shared paper)Sian Noble (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Social Science & Medicine (2 papers)BMC Family Practice (1 paper)Bone & Joint Open (1 paper)Journal of Mental Health (1 paper)Musculoskeletal Care (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesQatar
In The Last Decade
Emma Johnson
13 papers receiving 240 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Health 26
- Leadership and Management 3
- General Health Professions 40
- Surgery 69
- Gender Studies 14
Countries citing papers authored by Emma Johnson
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Johnson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Johnson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Johnson. The network helps show where Emma Johnson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 51 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 32 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 28 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 27 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2024 | 1 |
About Emma Johnson
Emma Johnson is a scholar working on Surgery, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Health and Gender Studies, having authored 13 papers that have together received 243 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (4 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (2 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (2 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper), Hip disorders and treatments (1 paper) and Employment and Welfare Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (26 citations), Leadership and Management (3 citations), General Health Professions (40 citations), Surgery (69 citations) and Gender Studies (14 citations). Emma Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Rachael Gooberman‐Hill, Jeremy Horwood, Ashley Blom, Elsa Marques, Olga Idriss Davis, Crista E. Johnson‐Agbakwu, Roseanne C. Schuster, Sian Noble, Karin Wachter and Gene Feder. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, BMC Family Practice, Bone & Joint Open, Journal of Mental Health and Musculoskeletal Care.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.