Countries where authors publish in Bone & Joint Open
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Bone & Joint Open. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Bone & Joint Open with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bone & Joint Open more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Bone & Joint Open. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Bone & Joint Open.
About Bone & Joint Open
The 746 papers published in Bone & Joint Open in the last decades have received a total of 5.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Bone & Joint Open usually cover Surgery (415 papers), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (40 papers), Health Informatics (7 papers), Oncology (83 papers) and Rehabilitation (20 papers) specifically the topics of Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (120 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (99 papers), COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (83 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (55 papers), Hip disorders and treatments (50 papers), Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (44 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (37 papers) and Foot and Ankle Surgery (28 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Bone & Joint Open are Fares S. Haddad, Ian A. Harris, Darren B. Chen, Samuel J. MacDessi, Babar Kayani, Johan Bellemans, William Griffiths-Jones, Sam Oussedik, Ahmed Magan and Chloe E. H. Scott.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.