Emma Davis

10 papers receiving 640 citations

Peers

Emma Davis
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Neurology 265
  • Biological Psychiatry 44
  • Developmental Neuroscience 62
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 38
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 112
Replace Carolina Coelho Cunha with:
Carolina Coelho Cunha Portugal
Sarah K. Williams Germany
Csilla Vincze Hungary
Lisa N. Quach United States
Xuehong Zhou China
Alejandra Kun Uruguay
Travis T. Burns United States
Yoko Tohyama Japan
Brandon M Jones United States
Matthew T. Buckley United States
Emma Davis relative to Carolina Coelho Cunha Portugal Carolina Coelho Cunha's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Carolina Coelho Cunha · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Davis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Davis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Davis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Davis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Davis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Davis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Davis. The network helps show where Emma Davis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Davis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Davis Line = papers co-authored together Emma Davis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 1994306
2 2014205
3 200037
4 202128
5 201327
6 201523
7 201715
8 20136
9 20164
10
Accumulation of plutonium in mammalian wildlife tissues: comparison of recent data with the ICRP distribution models
20141

About Emma Davis

Emma Davis is a scholar working on Neurology, Global and Planetary Change, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 10 papers that have together received 652 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (3 papers), Radioactive contamination and transfer (3 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (2 papers), Radioactivity and Radon Measurements (2 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (1 paper), Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology (1 paper) and Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (265 citations), Biological Psychiatry (44 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (62 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (38 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (112 citations). Emma Davis has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include W E G Thomas, Nicholas R. Howell, Richard B. Banati, Ryan J. Middleton, Tien Q. Pham, Paul D. Callaghan, Sandra Fok, Marie Claude Grégoire, Alexander Szabo and Winnie Wai-Ying Kam. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, Physics in Medicine and Biology, EJNMMI Research and Marine and Freshwater Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact