Emma Danelius

18 papers receiving 503 citations

Peers

Emma Danelius
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Structural Biology 11
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 66
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 77
  • Molecular Biology 313
  • Spectroscopy 77
Replace Guanglei Cui with:
Guanglei Cui United States
Lianne H. E. Wieske Sweden
Evgenii L. Kovrigin United States
Andreas Jabs Germany
Cécile Bon France
Krzysztof Z. Łączkowski Poland
Rajasri Bhattacharyya India
Octav Caldararu Sweden
Eric T. Mack United States
Dominic P. O′Brien United Kingdom
Emma Danelius relative to Guanglei Cui United States Guanglei Cui's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Guanglei Cui · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Danelius

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Danelius's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Danelius with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Danelius more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Danelius

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Danelius. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Danelius. The network helps show where Emma Danelius may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Danelius, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Danelius Line = papers co-authored together Emma Danelius links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 202098
2 201873
3 201769
4 202255
5 202035
6 201927
7 202223
8 201622
9 202322
10 201920
11 201315
12 202313
13 202312
14 201710
15 20248
16 20214
17 20152
18 20241
19 20250

About Emma Danelius

Emma Danelius is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Materials Chemistry, Spectroscopy, Organic Chemistry and Infectious Diseases, having authored 19 papers that have together received 509 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (7 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (6 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (3 papers), HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment (3 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (3 papers), Click Chemistry and Applications (2 papers), Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Structural Biology (11 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (66 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (77 citations), Molecular Biology (313 citations) and Spectroscopy (77 citations). Emma Danelius has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Máté Erdélyi, Tamir Gonen, Jan Kihlberg, Stefan Peintner, Vasanthanathan Poongavanam, Lianne H. E. Wieske, Frances H. Arnold, Nicholas J. Porter, Hanna Andersson and Jürgen Gräfenstein. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, ACS Omega, Chemistry - A European Journal, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact