Emma Baker

94 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Emma Baker
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Health 576
  • Finance 724
  • Urban Studies 248
  • General Health Professions 784
  • Demography 277
Replace Rosemary Hiscock with:
Rosemary Hiscock United Kingdom
Jerome Billeter
Ingrid Gould Ellen United States
Lisa Sanbonmatsu United States
Lance Freeman United States
Gideon Bolt Netherlands
Lauren J. Krivo United States
John Mohan United Kingdom
Geoffrey DeVerteuil United Kingdom
Samantha Friedman United States
Emma Baker relative to Rosemary Hiscock United Kingdom Rosemary Hiscock's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Rosemary Hiscock · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Baker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Baker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Baker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Baker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Baker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Baker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Baker. The network helps show where Emma Baker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Baker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Baker Line = papers co-authored together Emma Baker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 101 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019194
2 2011147
3 2013144
4 2017109
5 201699
6 201595
7 201293
8 201693
9 201492
10 201181
11 201577
12 201966
13 201666
14 201364
15 202059
16 201756
17 201952
18 201549
19 202344
20 202241

About Emma Baker

Emma Baker is a scholar working on Finance, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Health and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 101 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (47 papers), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (26 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (20 papers), Housing Market and Economics (16 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (14 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (9 papers), Climate Change and Health Impacts (8 papers) and Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (576 citations), Finance (724 citations), Urban Studies (248 citations), General Health Professions (784 citations) and Demography (277 citations). Emma Baker has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Rebecca Bentley, Kate Mason, Andrew Beer, Lyrian Daniel, Laurence Lester, Anne Kavanagh, Ankur Singh, Zoe Aitken, David J. Pevalin and Aaron Reeves. Their work appears in journals such as Housing Studies, International Journal of Housing Policy, Social Science & Medicine, Urban Policy and Research and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact