Emily Yates‐Doerr
Impact in
- Pharmacy top 2%
- Obesity and Health Practices
-
- Geographies of human-animal interactions
Papers in
- Genetics 9
- Race, Genetics, and Society 8
-
- Culinary Culture and Tourism 8
- Co-authors
- Megan A. Carney (5 shared papers)Annemarie Mol (2 shared papers)Emilia Sanabria (1 shared paper)Alyshia Gálvez (5 shared papers)Malini Sur (2 shared papers)Amalinda Savirani (2 shared papers)Priya Satalkar (2 shared papers)Nasima Selim (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- American Anthropologist (3 papers)Medical Anthropology Quarterly (3 papers)Hau Journal of Ethnographic Theory (3 papers)Medical Anthropology (2 papers)BioSocieties (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsMexico
In The Last Decade
Emily Yates‐Doerr
35 papers receiving 615 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Pharmacy 115
- Geography, Planning and Development 123
- Anthropology 70
- Food Science 113
- General Health Professions 146
Countries citing papers authored by Emily Yates‐Doerr
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Yates‐Doerr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Yates‐Doerr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Yates‐Doerr more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Yates‐Doerr
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Yates‐Doerr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Yates‐Doerr. The network helps show where Emily Yates‐Doerr may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Yates‐Doerr, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 99 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 58 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 55 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 48 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 45 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 43 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 35 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 29 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 28 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 25 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 22 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 21 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 20 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 18 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 13 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 19 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 20 | 2011 | 7 |
About Emily Yates‐Doerr
Emily Yates‐Doerr is a scholar working on Genetics, Food Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science and Pharmacy, having authored 40 papers that have together received 662 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (8 papers), Race, Genetics, and Society (8 papers), Culinary Culture and Tourism (8 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (7 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (7 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (4 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (3 papers) and Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (115 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (123 citations), Anthropology (70 citations), Food Science (113 citations) and General Health Professions (146 citations). Emily Yates‐Doerr has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Megan A. Carney, Annemarie Mol, Emilia Sanabria, Alyshia Gálvez, Malini Sur, Amalinda Savirani, Priya Satalkar, Nasima Selim, Lauren Carruth and Emily Mendenhall. Their work appears in journals such as American Anthropologist, Medical Anthropology Quarterly, Hau Journal of Ethnographic Theory, Medical Anthropology and BioSocieties.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.