Medical Anthropology Quarterly

1.3k papers and 27.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Medical Anthropology Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 27.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Medical Anthropology Quarterly usually cover Sociology and Political Science (348 papers), General Health Professions (263 papers) and Clinical Psychology (161 papers) specifically the topics of Race, Genetics, and Society (105 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (100 papers) and Migration, Health and Trauma (57 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Medical Anthropology Quarterly are Margaret Lock, Nancy Scheper‐Hughes, Merrill Singer, Scott Clair, Marcia C. Inhorn, Ellen S. Lazarus, Rayna Rapp, Gay Becker, Roberta D. Baer and Sharon R. Kaufman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Medical Anthropology Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Medical Anthropology Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Medical Anthropology Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Medical Anthropology Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Medical Anthropology Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Medical Anthropology Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Medical Anthropology Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025