Emily Slade

596 citations
44 papers · 338 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Emily Slade

34 papers receiving 331 citations

Peers

Emily Slade
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Health Informatics 34
  • Computer Science Applications 26
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 27
  • Aging 4
  • Statistics and Probability 15
Replace Joël Kuiper with:
Joël Kuiper Netherlands
Seyyed Mohammad Tabatabaei Iran
Stefan Konigorski Germany
Tara Schmidlen United States
John Rumbold United Kingdom
Sue M. Challinor United States
Marina Zhanaliyeva Kazakhstan
Tomoko Tsukamoto Japan
Omar A. Alshaya Saudi Arabia
Jenny McDonald New Zealand
Emily Slade relative to Joël Kuiper Netherlands Joël Kuiper's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Joël Kuiper · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Slade

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Slade's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Slade with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Slade more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Slade

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Slade. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Slade. The network helps show where Emily Slade may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Slade, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Slade Line = papers co-authored together Emily Slade links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202368
2 202151
3 202039
4 201929
5 201924
6 202121
7 202114
8 202114
9 202011
10 20247
11 20236
12 20235
13 20225
14 20204
15 20214
16 20224
17 20204
18 20233
19 20193
20 20232

About Emily Slade

Emily Slade is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology, Molecular Biology, Clinical Psychology and Information Systems and Management, having authored 44 papers that have together received 338 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (6 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (4 papers), Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration (4 papers), Physical Activity and Health (4 papers), Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research (4 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (3 papers), Biomedical and Engineering Education (3 papers) and Dietary Effects on Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (34 citations), Computer Science Applications (26 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (27 citations), Aging (4 citations) and Statistics and Probability (15 citations). Emily Slade has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Amanda R. Ellis, Melissa Naylor, Alison K. Ventura, Julie S. Pendergast, Steven A. Claas, Kevin Xie, David W. Fardo, Marguerite R. Irvin, Donna K. Arnett and Sandra J. Legan. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Rural Health, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, Resuscitation Plus, Statistics in Medicine and Journal of Affective Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact