William W. Stoops

166 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Peers

William W. Stoops
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Toxicology 321
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.6k
  • Applied Psychology 323
  • General Decision Sciences 99
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 572
Replace Joshua A. Lile with:
Joshua A. Lile United States
Craig R. Rush United States
Thomas F. Newton United States
Carl L. Hart United States
John Grabowski United States
Ira A. Liebson United States
Stephen J. Heishman United States
John D. Roache United States
Ronald N. Ehrman United States
Vincent M. Hendriks Netherlands
William W. Stoops relative to Joshua A. Lile United States Joshua A. Lile's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Joshua A. Lile · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William W. Stoops

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William W. Stoops's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William W. Stoops with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William W. Stoops more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William W. Stoops

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William W. Stoops. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William W. Stoops. The network helps show where William W. Stoops may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William W. Stoops, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William W. Stoops Line = papers co-authored together William W. Stoops links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 172 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018207
2 2016119
3 2019105
4 200996
5 201792
6 201086
7 200381
8 200576
9 200671
10 201069
11 200567
12 201964
13 200463
14 201663
15 201063
16 202059
17 200557
18 200353
19 201352
20 200852

About William W. Stoops

William W. Stoops is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Epidemiology, Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Toxicology, having authored 172 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (71 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (33 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (26 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (22 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (22 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (12 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (12 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (321 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.6k citations), Applied Psychology (323 citations), General Decision Sciences (99 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (572 citations). William W. Stoops has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Craig R. Rush, Justin C. Strickland, Joshua A. Lile, Paul E.A. Glaser, Lon R. Hays, Andrea R. Vansickel, Mark T. Fillmore, Jennifer R. Havens, Erika Pike and Katherine R. Marks. Their work appears in journals such as Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Psychopharmacology, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology and The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact