Resuscitation Plus

657 papers and 2.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 657 papers published in Resuscitation Plus in the last decades have received a total of 2.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Resuscitation Plus usually cover Emergency Medicine (613 papers), Biomedical Engineering (153 papers) and Surgery (121 papers) specifically the topics of Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (590 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (157 papers) and Emergency and Acute Care Studies (124 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Resuscitation Plus are Gavin D. Perkins, Rachael Fothergill, Katie N. Dainty, Andrew Lockey, Robert Greif, Robert W. Neumar, Sheldon Cheskes, Ian R. Drennan, Adam Cheng and Brian Grunau.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Resuscitation Plus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Resuscitation Plus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Resuscitation Plus.

Countries where authors publish in Resuscitation Plus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Resuscitation Plus. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Resuscitation Plus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Resuscitation Plus more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025