Emily Shields

834 citations
15 papers · 562 · h-index 10

Impact in

  • Genetics top 10%
    • Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
    • Diabetes and associated disorders

Papers in

Emily Shields

15 papers receiving 557 citations

Peers

Emily Shields
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Genetics 275
  • Aging 13
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 121
  • Insect Science 80
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 122
Replace Hiroyuki Kose with:
Hiroyuki Kose Japan
Ana Talamillo Spain
Célia Baltazar Portugal
Steeve Cruchet Switzerland
Sudhir Gopal Tattikota United States
W.J. Curry United Kingdom
Robert A. Drewell United States
Meridee Phistry United States
Jan Ryneš Czechia
Laura Boulan France
Emily Shields relative to Hiroyuki Kose Japan Hiroyuki Kose's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.1×
Hiroyuki Kose · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Shields

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Shields's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Shields with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Shields more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Shields

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Shields. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Shields. The network helps show where Emily Shields may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Shields, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Shields Line = papers co-authored together Emily Shields links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2017131
2 201389
3 201974
4 202051
5 201844
6 201539
7 202035
8 202231
9 201928
10 202117
11 20147
12 20077
13 20226
14
Strategic action: Community engagement professionals as institutional change leaders
20192
15 20181

About Emily Shields

Emily Shields is a scholar working on Genetics, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Surgery and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 15 papers that have together received 562 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (4 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (3 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (2 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (2 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (2 papers), Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (2 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (2 papers) and Diabetes and associated disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (275 citations), Aging (13 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (121 citations), Insect Science (80 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (122 citations). Emily Shields has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Roberto Bonasio, Matthew M. Rankin, Jake A. Kushner, Benjamin A. García, Qingqing Yan, Kavitha Sarma, Lihong Sheng, Karl M. Glastad, Shelley L. Berger and Janko Gospočić. Their work appears in journals such as Cell Reports, Journal of Information Literacy, Research in Learning Technology, BMC Biology and Current Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact