Emily Read

27 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Emily Read
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Research and Theory 247
  • Leadership and Management 42
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 183
  • General Health Professions 314
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 10
Replace Mervi Flinkman with:
Mervi Flinkman Finland
How Lee Canada
Zohreh Vanaki Iran
Lori Candela United States
Tsung‐Lan Chu Taiwan
Zaid Al‐Hamdan Jordan
Olaf Timmermans Belgium
Shwu‐Ru Liou Taiwan
Liisa Kuokkanen Finland
Stephen J. Cavanagh United Kingdom
Emily Read relative to Mervi Flinkman Finland Mervi Flinkman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Mervi Flinkman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Read

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Read's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Read with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Read more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Read

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Read. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Read. The network helps show where Emily Read may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Read, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Read Line = papers co-authored together Emily Read links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016225
2 2015130
3 2016107
4 201786
5 201679
6 201670
7 202055
8 201349
9 201746
10 201845
11 201141
12 201440
13 201139
14 201723
15 202118
16 202214
17 202312
18 202210
19 20249
20 20207

About Emily Read

Emily Read is a scholar working on Research and Theory, General Health Professions, Occupational Therapy, Immunology and Demography, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing education and management (8 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (3 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (3 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (2 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (2 papers), IL-33, ST2, and ILC Pathways (2 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (1 paper) and Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (247 citations), Leadership and Management (42 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (183 citations), General Health Professions (314 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (10 citations). Emily Read has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Heather K. Spence Laschinger, Sheila A. Boamah, Junhong Zhu, Carol Wong, Colleen O’Connell, Chris A. McGibbon, Melanie I. Stuckey, Claudio Munoz, Robert J. Petrella and Elizabeth Russell-Minda. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration, Nursing Open and Journal of Nursing Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact