Emily Pedersen
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 5%
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Speech and Hearing top 5%
- Noise Effects and Management
Papers in
-
- Data Visualization and Analytics 1
- Video Analysis and Summarization 1
-
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation 1
- Co-authors
- Nicholas S. Reed (2 shared papers)Jonathan J. Suen (1 shared paper)Aishwarya Shukla (1 shared paper)Jeremy Applebaum (1 shared paper)Frank R. Lin (1 shared paper)Adele M. Goman (1 shared paper)Michael Harper (1 shared paper)Matthew Hoyer (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- BMC Health Services Research (1 paper)IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (1 paper)Alzheimer s & Dementia (1 paper)Otolaryngology (1 paper)Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Emily Pedersen
5 papers receiving 516 citations
Emily Pedersen's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Sensory Systems 78
- Speech and Hearing 81
- Cognitive Neuroscience 231
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 9
- Health 26
Countries citing papers authored by Emily Pedersen
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Pedersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Pedersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Pedersen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Pedersen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Pedersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Pedersen. The network helps show where Emily Pedersen may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 22 scholars most cited alongside Emily Pedersen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hearing Loss, Loneliness, and Social Isolation: A Systematic Review Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 417 |
| 2 | 2019 | 52 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 37 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 3 |
About Emily Pedersen
Emily Pedersen is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cognitive Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, Safety Research and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 5 papers that have together received 523 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (1 paper), Data Visualization and Analytics (1 paper), Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (1 paper), Video Analysis and Summarization (1 paper), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (1 paper), Persona Design and Applications (1 paper) and Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (78 citations), Speech and Hearing (81 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (231 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (9 citations) and Health (26 citations). Emily Pedersen has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas S. Reed, Jonathan J. Suen, Aishwarya Shukla, Jeremy Applebaum, Frank R. Lin, Adele M. Goman, Michael Harper, Matthew Hoyer, Carrie Price and Niloufar Salehi. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Health Services Research, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Alzheimer s & Dementia, Otolaryngology and Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.