Emily Kate Wright

72 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Emily Kate Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Genetics 1.2k
  • Speech and Hearing 51
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 201
  • Molecular Biology 310
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 17
Replace Daniela Elena Serban with:
Daniela Elena Serban Romania
Ghassan T. Wahbeh United States
Julajak Limsrivilai Thailand
Donald C. Liu United States
Seema A Patil United States
Catherine M. Bendel United States
David H. Kerman United States
Girish S Hiremath United States
Michal Kori Israel
Sam S. Mehr Australia
Emily Kate Wright relative to Daniela Elena Serban Romania Daniela Elena Serban's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.4×
Daniela Elena Serban · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Kate Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Kate Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Kate Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Kate Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Kate Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Kate Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Kate Wright. The network helps show where Emily Kate Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Kate Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Kate Wright Line = papers co-authored together Emily Kate Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015242
2 2015179
3 2018143
4 201698
5 201890
6 201475
7 202171
8 202159
9 202154
10 201453
11 202050
12 202043
13 201438
14 202236
15 202436
16 202034
17 201527
18 202127
19 201625
20 201825

About Emily Kate Wright

Emily Kate Wright is a scholar working on Genetics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Family Practice, Molecular Biology and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 80 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Inflammatory Bowel Disease (57 papers), Pregnancy and Medication Impact (15 papers), Gut microbiota and health (5 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (2 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (2 papers), Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (1 paper), Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (1 paper) and Nursing Roles and Practices (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (1.2k citations), Speech and Hearing (51 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (201 citations), Molecular Biology (310 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (17 citations). Emily Kate Wright has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Michael A. Kamm, Michael Inouye, Shu Mei Teo, Carl D. Kirkwood, Josef Wagner, Peter P. De Cruz, Nik S. Ding, Ola Niewiadomski, Amy L. Hamilton and Chamara Basnayake. Their work appears in journals such as Gastroenterology, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Journal of Crohn s and Colitis, Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics and Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact