Mark Lust

32 papers receiving 425 citations

Peers

Mark Lust
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Genetics 270
  • Hepatology 64
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 40
  • Neurology 12
  • Speech and Hearing 4
Replace A.B. van Nunen with:
A.B. van Nunen Netherlands
Joaquín Poza Cordón Spain
Raquel Vicente Spain
Marianne Kajbæk Vester-Andersen Denmark
Cristina Suárez Ferrer Spain
Katie Piwnica–Worms United States
Andrea Affronti Italy
Nuria Maroto Spain
Emma K Flanagan Australia
Zachary A. Zator United States
Mark Lust relative to A.B. van Nunen Netherlands A.B. van Nunen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.7×
A.B. van Nunen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Lust

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Lust's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Lust with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Lust more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Lust

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Lust. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Lust. The network helps show where Mark Lust may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Lust, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Lust Line = papers co-authored together Mark Lust links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201172
2 202154
3 201335
4 201134
5 202125
6 201922
7 201218
8 201317
9 201517
10 200816
11 202116
12 202416
13 200815
14 200814
15 202314
16 20219
17 20207
18 20066
19 20246
20 20224

About Mark Lust

Mark Lust is a scholar working on Genetics, Hepatology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Family Practice and Oncology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 437 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Inflammatory Bowel Disease (17 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (3 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (2 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers), Liver Diseases and Immunity (2 papers), Pregnancy and Medication Impact (2 papers), Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (1 paper) and Hepatitis C virus research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (270 citations), Hepatology (64 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (40 citations), Neurology (12 citations) and Speech and Hearing (4 citations). Mark Lust has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Michael A. Kamm, Emily Kate Wright, William R. Connell, David Eng Hui Ong, Sally Bell, John Halliday, Barbara Braden, Roger William Chapman, Simon P.L. Travis and Emma Louise Culver. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Journal of Crohn s and Colitis, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Gastroenterology and Journal of Hepatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact