Emily Hacker

24 papers receiving 246 citations

Peers

Emily Hacker
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 8
  • Infectious Diseases 61
  • Modeling and Simulation 14
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 17
  • Human-Computer Interaction 8
Replace Mary Dittrich with:
Mary Dittrich United States
Fengxiang Wei China
Maryam Nasiri Iran
Jie Tan China
Congying Song China
Oriana D’Ecclesiis Italy
Zhixin Huang China
Sara M. Elgendy United Arab Emirates
Xiuchao Geng China
Zhaomu Zeng China
Emily Hacker relative to Mary Dittrich United States Mary Dittrich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Mary Dittrich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Hacker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Hacker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Hacker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Hacker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Hacker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Hacker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Hacker. The network helps show where Emily Hacker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Hacker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Hacker Line = papers co-authored together Emily Hacker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202172
2 201938
3 202033
4 201918
5 200715
6 202312
7 202011
8 20227
9 20206
10 20215
11 20215
12 20224
13 20194
14 20193
15 20223
16 20053
17 20212
18 20232
19 20242
20 19972

About Emily Hacker

Emily Hacker is a scholar working on Surgery, Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Immunology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 252 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (3 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (2 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (2 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (2 papers), Hepatitis B Virus Studies (2 papers), Urological Disorders and Treatments (2 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (2 papers) and Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human Factors and Ergonomics (8 citations), Infectious Diseases (61 citations), Modeling and Simulation (14 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (17 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (8 citations). Emily Hacker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Türkiye and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Alp Ozpinar, Meriç A. Altinoz, Aysel Özpınar, İlhan Elmacı, Ahmet Hacımüftüoğlu, Gülaçtı Topçu, Vic Veguilla, Michael Daugherty, Fatimah S. Dawood and Melissa A. Rolfes. Their work appears in journals such as Urology, The International Journal of Spine Surgery, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, JAMA Network Open and Neurochemical Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact