Emily Ford

25 papers receiving 310 citations

Peers

Emily Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Reproductive Medicine 116
  • Library and Information Sciences 16
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 51
  • Information Systems and Management 41
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 118
Replace Vivian Lewis with:
Vivian Lewis United States
Lisa Judy Chin United States
Tom Wilkie United Kingdom
Alison McCook United States
Kari Baldwin United States
Diana Soares Portugal
Lorenzo Del Savio Germany
Rawat Seema India
Donrich Thaldar South Africa
Barbara Gastel United States
Emily Ford relative to Vivian Lewis United States Vivian Lewis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×51×
Vivian Lewis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Ford. The network helps show where Emily Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Emily Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Ford Line = papers co-authored together Emily Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014110
2 201383
3 201235
4 202027
5 201514
6 201313
7 20136
8 20165
9 20195
10 20144
11 20103
12 20173
13 20243
14
What Do We Do and Why Do We Do It?
20122
15 20172
16 20242
17 20182
18 20172
19
Open Ethos Publishing at Code4Lib Journal and In the Library with the Lead Pipe
20121
20
Tryin’ to Get My Mojo Workin’
20101

About Emily Ford

Emily Ford is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Information Systems, Information Systems and Management, Library and Information Sciences and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 28 papers that have together received 328 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include scientometrics and bibliometrics research (3 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (3 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (2 papers), Library Science and Administration (2 papers), Digital Storytelling and Education (2 papers), Academic Publishing and Open Access (2 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (116 citations), Library and Information Sciences (16 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (51 citations), Information Systems and Management (41 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (118 citations). Emily Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Anusch Yazdani, Ben Kroon, Simon McDowell, Demián Glujovsky, Roger Hart, Brittany Wong, Betty T. Izumi, Dawn M. Richardson, Keith Harrison and Jon Adams. Their work appears in journals such as College & Research Libraries News, College & Research Libraries, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Journal of Scholarly Publishing and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact