Emily E. Hare
Impact in
Papers in
- Genetics 3
- Animal Genetics and Reproduction 1
- Genetic diversity and population structure 1
-
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 2
- Insect Resistance and Genetics 1
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 1
- Co-authors
- Michael B. Eisen (3 shared papers)Brant K. Peterson (3 shared papers)Venky N. Iyer (2 shared papers)J. Spencer Johnston (1 shared paper)Rudolf Meier (1 shared paper)Kerry E. Kingham (1 shared paper)Stephen E. Lincoln (1 shared paper)Meredith A. Mills (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- PLoS Genetics (2 papers)PLoS ONE (1 paper)Journal of Heredity (1 paper)Journal of Clinical Oncology (1 paper)BMC Evolutionary Biology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSingapore
In The Last Decade
Emily E. Hare
7 papers receiving 771 citations
Emily E. Hare's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Aging 42
- Genetics 362
- Cancer Research 113
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 99
- Molecular Biology 396
Countries citing papers authored by Emily E. Hare
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily E. Hare's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily E. Hare with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily E. Hare more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily E. Hare
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily E. Hare. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily E. Hare. The network helps show where Emily E. Hare may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Emily E. Hare, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clinical Evaluation of a Multiple-Gene Sequencing Panel for Hereditary Cancer Risk Assessment Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 368 |
| 2 | 2008 | 226 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 93 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 39 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 38 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 22 | |
| 7 | 1979 | 11 | |
| 8 | SUBNANOMOLE – RANGE AMINO ANALYSIS | 1977 | 0 |
About Emily E. Hare
Emily E. Hare is a scholar working on Genetics, Molecular Biology, Clinical Biochemistry, Insect Science and Plant Science, having authored 8 papers that have together received 797 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (2 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (1 paper), Insect Resistance and Genetics (1 paper), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (1 paper), Genetic diversity and population structure (1 paper), Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (1 paper), Plant Molecular Biology Research (1 paper) and Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (42 citations), Genetics (362 citations), Cancer Research (113 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (99 citations) and Molecular Biology (396 citations). Emily E. Hare has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Michael B. Eisen, Brant K. Peterson, Venky N. Iyer, J. Spencer Johnston, Rudolf Meier, Kerry E. Kingham, Stephen E. Lincoln, Meredith A. Mills, Valerie McGuire and Uri Ladabaum. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS Genetics, PLoS ONE, Journal of Heredity, Journal of Clinical Oncology and BMC Evolutionary Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.