Emily Deans
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Gambling Behavior and Treatments
- Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
-
- Wine Industry and Tourism
Papers in
-
- Gambling Behavior and Treatments 4
- Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology 2
-
- Doping in Sports 1
- Co-authors
- Mike Daube (5 shared papers)Samantha Thomas (5 shared papers)Jeffrey L. Derevensky (4 shared papers)Ross Gordon (1 shared paper)Hannah Pitt (1 shared paper)Melanie Randle (1 shared paper)Amy Bestman (1 shared paper)Melissa Stoneham (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- BMC Public Health (2 papers)Evaluation and Program Planning (1 paper)Harm Reduction Journal (1 paper)Social Science & Medicine (1 paper)BMC Health Services Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Emily Deans
9 papers receiving 340 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Clinical Psychology 291
- Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 12
- Gender Studies 35
- Economics and Econometrics 88
- Applied Psychology 10
Countries citing papers authored by Emily Deans
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Deans's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Deans with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Deans more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Deans
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Deans. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Deans. The network helps show where Emily Deans may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Emily Deans, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 104 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 71 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 62 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 58 | |
| 5 | The marketing of wagering on social media : an analysis of promotional content on YouTube, Twitter and Facebook | 2015 | 37 |
| 6 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2025 | 0 |
About Emily Deans
Emily Deans is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Marketing, Information Systems and Management and Epidemiology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 343 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gambling Behavior and Treatments (4 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (2 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (1 paper), Sports Analytics and Performance (1 paper), Doping in Sports (1 paper), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (1 paper), Sports, Gender, and Society (1 paper) and Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (291 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (12 citations), Gender Studies (35 citations), Economics and Econometrics (88 citations) and Applied Psychology (10 citations). Emily Deans has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mike Daube, Samantha Thomas, Jeffrey L. Derevensky, Ross Gordon, Hannah Pitt, Melanie Randle, Amy Bestman, Melissa Stoneham, Elizabeth Conroy and Ilse Blignault. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Public Health, Evaluation and Program Planning, Harm Reduction Journal, Social Science & Medicine and BMC Health Services Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.