Emily Brooks

19 papers receiving 592 citations

Peers

Emily Brooks
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Transplantation 68
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 53
  • Metals and Alloys 35
  • Biomaterials 133
  • Materials Chemistry 194
Replace Hong Xiao with:
Hong Xiao China
Peter Fleckenstein Denmark
Ping Zhong China
Giovanni Fratto Italy
Ryo Hirayama Japan
Deping Liu China
Robert D. Barrett New Zealand
Nick Walters United Kingdom
Rahul Bhola United States
Emily Brooks relative to Hong Xiao China Hong Xiao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Hong Xiao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Brooks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Brooks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Brooks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Brooks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Brooks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Brooks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Brooks. The network helps show where Emily Brooks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Brooks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Brooks Line = papers co-authored together Emily Brooks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2003135
2 201687
3 201678
4 201758
5 201448
6 201738
7 201537
8 201820
9 202216
10 201816
11 201515
12 202212
13 202111
14 201910
15 20188
16 20224
17 20203
18 20192
19
Evaluation of multiple linear regression limited sampling strategies for enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in adult kidney transplant recipients.
20181

About Emily Brooks

Emily Brooks is a scholar working on Transplantation, Materials Chemistry, Biomaterials, Surgery and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 19 papers that have together received 599 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (6 papers), Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition (6 papers), Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications (4 papers), Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties (3 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (2 papers), Electrolyte and hormonal disorders (2 papers), Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals (2 papers) and Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (68 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (53 citations), Metals and Alloys (35 citations), Biomaterials (133 citations) and Materials Chemistry (194 citations). Emily Brooks has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mark T. Ehrensberger, Susan E. Tett, Nicole M. Isbel, Christine E. Staatz, Zenon Rayter, Jeremy N. V. Miles, Sue Plummer, Kavita Vedhara, Deborah Tallon and Stafford L. Lightman. Their work appears in journals such as Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Materials Science and Engineering C and The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact