Emily Brede

906 citations
28 papers · 514 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

    • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation 5
    • Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions 2
    • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 1

Emily Brede

28 papers receiving 496 citations

Peers

Emily Brede
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Pharmacology 180
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 75
  • Applied Psychology 20
  • Occupational Therapy 16
  • Clinical Psychology 76
Replace Stéphanie Volders with:
Stéphanie Volders Netherlands
Sin Ki Ng Australia
E. Neubauer Germany
R.A. Ramsay Canada
Felix J. Saha Germany
Annika Bring Sweden
Jahan Heidari Germany
Sungkun Cho South Korea
Masataka Umeda United States
Elin Bolle Strand Norway
Emily Brede relative to Stéphanie Volders Netherlands Stéphanie Volders's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Stéphanie Volders · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Brede

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Brede's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Brede with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Brede more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Brede

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Brede. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Brede. The network helps show where Emily Brede may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Brede, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Brede Line = papers co-authored together Emily Brede links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201552
2 200947
3 201044
4 201344
5 201341
6 201834
7 201730
8 201724
9 201322
10 201818
11 201716
12 201816
13 201714
14 201214
15 201113
16 201813
17 201312
18 201911
19 201611
20 20198

About Emily Brede

Emily Brede is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Biomedical Engineering and Physiology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 514 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (5 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (2 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (2 papers), Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Urban Green Space and Health (1 paper), Pain Management and Treatment (1 paper) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (180 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (75 citations), Applied Psychology (20 citations), Occupational Therapy (16 citations) and Clinical Psychology (76 citations). Emily Brede has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Robert J. Gatchel, Tom G. Mayer, Randy Neblett, Andrew J. Waters, Laura A. Talbot, E. Jeffrey Metter, Christine Muench, R. Ross MacLean, Mehmet Sofuoglu and Cendrine Robinson. Their work appears in journals such as The Spine Journal, Addictive Behaviors, Spine, Clinical Journal of Pain and Kidney International Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact