Emelda E. Chukwu

22 papers receiving 215 citations

Peers

Emelda E. Chukwu
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 116
  • Molecular Medicine 38
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 11
  • Clinical Biochemistry 14
  • Food Science 29
Replace Mentor Ali Ber Lucien with:
Mentor Ali Ber Lucien United States
Afreenish Amir Pakistan
Lucyna Gozdzielewska United Kingdom
Brooke M. Ramay Guatemala
Mohammed Irfan India
Zain Rizvi United States
Naomi M. Fuller United Kingdom
Philip Mathew India
Adeel Aslam Malaysia
Abiodun Egwuenu Nigeria
Emelda E. Chukwu relative to Mentor Ali Ber Lucien United States Mentor Ali Ber Lucien's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Mentor Ali Ber Lucien · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emelda E. Chukwu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emelda E. Chukwu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emelda E. Chukwu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emelda E. Chukwu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emelda E. Chukwu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emelda E. Chukwu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emelda E. Chukwu. The network helps show where Emelda E. Chukwu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emelda E. Chukwu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emelda E. Chukwu Line = papers co-authored together Emelda E. Chukwu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202056
2 202149
3 201626
4 201418
5 202217
6 202111
7 20249
8 20206
9 20194
10 20144
11 20213
12 20233
13 20242
14 20242
15
Role of Anaerobes as Probiotic Organisms
20142
16 20251
17 20171
18 20251
19 20251
20 20241

About Emelda E. Chukwu

Emelda E. Chukwu is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Food Science, Molecular Biology and General Health Professions, having authored 27 papers that have together received 220 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotic Use and Resistance (6 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (4 papers), Gut microbiota and health (3 papers), Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (2 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (2 papers), Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (1 paper), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (1 paper) and Disaster Management and Resilience (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (116 citations), Molecular Medicine (38 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (11 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (14 citations) and Food Science (29 citations). Emelda E. Chukwu has collaborated with scholars based in Nigeria, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Folasade Ogunsola, Rosemary Audu, David Oladele, Francisca Nwaokorie, Akitoye O. Coker, Ismail Abdus-Salam, Mário Júlio Ávila-Campos, Rosa L. Solís, Ifeoma Idigbe and Chika Onwuamah. Their work appears in journals such as Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, AMBIO, PLoS ONE, Political Studies and BMC Infectious Diseases.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact