Elsbeth Neil

46 papers receiving 737 citations

Peers

Elsbeth Neil
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Safety Research 704
  • Reproductive Medicine 141
  • Clinical Psychology 331
  • Demography 195
  • Sociology and Political Science 379
Replace Susan Ayers‐Lopez with:
Susan Ayers‐Lopez United States
Mary Beek United Kingdom
Peter Selman United Kingdom
Reuben Pannor United States
Amanda L. Baden United States
Gary Clapton United Kingdom
Lisa Laumann-Billings United States
Elizabeth P. Cramer United States
Julie K. Kohler United States
Robin M. Deutsch United States
Elsbeth Neil relative to Susan Ayers‐Lopez United States Susan Ayers‐Lopez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Susan Ayers‐Lopez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Elsbeth Neil

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elsbeth Neil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elsbeth Neil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elsbeth Neil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elsbeth Neil

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elsbeth Neil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elsbeth Neil. The network helps show where Elsbeth Neil may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Elsbeth Neil, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Elsbeth Neil Line = papers co-authored together Elsbeth Neil links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200788
2 200966
3 201160
4 200347
5 200645
6 200241
7 200038
8
Helping Birth Families: Services, Costs and Outcomes
201032
9
International advances in adoption research for practice
200929
10 201328
11
Supporting direct contact after adoption
201128
12 201225
13 201325
14 200224
15
Conclusions: a transactional model for thinking about contact
200419
16 200318
17 200916
18 200315
19 202215
20
Contact after adoption
200913

About Elsbeth Neil

Elsbeth Neil is a scholar working on Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Reproductive Medicine and Demography, having authored 49 papers that have together received 843 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Welfare and Adoption (37 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (16 papers), Family Support in Illness (8 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (7 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (6 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (5 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (4 papers) and Healthcare innovation and challenges (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (704 citations), Reproductive Medicine (141 citations), Clinical Psychology (331 citations), Demography (195 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (379 citations). Elsbeth Neil has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Gretchen Miller Wrobel, Jeanette Cossar, Mary Beek, Gillian Schofield, Jill Cossar, David Howe, June Thoburn, J H Cossar, Paula Lorgelly and Julie Young. Their work appears in journals such as Adoption & Fostering, Child & Family Social Work, Adoption Quarterly, The British Journal of Social Work and Children and Youth Services Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact