Ellen Schoof

32 papers receiving 887 citations

Peers

Ellen Schoof
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 106
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 98
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 154
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 29
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 141
Replace Robert De Matteo with:
Robert De Matteo Australia
Frank D. Reilly United States
Irene Koukoulas Australia
Michael J Cole Australia
Claude Robyn Belgium
Fan Meng China
Caroline Adams United States
Pedro M. Pimentel‐Coelho Brazil
Gerard Honig United States
Yves Garnier Germany
Ellen Schoof relative to Robert De Matteo Australia Robert De Matteo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Robert De Matteo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ellen Schoof

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ellen Schoof's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ellen Schoof with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ellen Schoof more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ellen Schoof

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ellen Schoof. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ellen Schoof. The network helps show where Ellen Schoof may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ellen Schoof, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ellen Schoof Line = papers co-authored together Ellen Schoof links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001102
2 200194
3 200169
4 200361
5 200158
6 200248
7 200346
8 200245
9 200341
10 199939
11 200135
12 200435
13 200232
14 200431
15 200327
16 200221
17 200220
18 200319
19 200216
20 200415

About Ellen Schoof

Ellen Schoof is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 32 papers that have together received 914 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (9 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (7 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (5 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (5 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (2 papers), Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments (2 papers) and Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (106 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (98 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (154 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (29 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (141 citations). Ellen Schoof has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Estonia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Wolfgang Rascher, Jörg Dötsch, Katharina von der Hardt, Michael A. Kandler, Jörg Dötsch, W. Frobenius, Michael Kirschbaum, D. Wénzel, H. G. Dörr and Ina Knerr. Their work appears in journals such as Hormone Research in Paediatrics, European Journal of Endocrinology, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Pediatric Research and European Journal of Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact