Ellen Schoof

31 papers receiving 852 citations

Peers

Ellen Schoof
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 102
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 93
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 29
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 144
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 129
Replace Robert De Matteo with:
Robert De Matteo Australia
Frank D. Reilly United States
Andreas Trotter Germany
Michael J Cole Australia
Caroline Adams United States
Fan Meng China
Gerard Honig United States
Pedro M. Pimentel‐Coelho Brazil
Yves Garnier Germany
Robert Birnbacher Austria
Ellen Schoof relative to Robert De Matteo Australia Robert De Matteo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Robert De Matteo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ellen Schoof

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ellen Schoof's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ellen Schoof with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ellen Schoof more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ellen Schoof

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ellen Schoof. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ellen Schoof. The network helps show where Ellen Schoof may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ellen Schoof, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ellen Schoof Line = papers co-authored together Ellen Schoof links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001100
2 200192
3 200168
4 200356
5 200154
6 200346
7 200245
8 200243
9 200340
10 200434
11 200133
12 199932
13 200231
14 200429
15 200324
16 200220
17 200220
18 200318
19 200216
20 200414

About Ellen Schoof

Ellen Schoof is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Molecular Biology and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 31 papers that have together received 870 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (9 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (7 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (5 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (5 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (2 papers), Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments (2 papers) and Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (102 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (93 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (29 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (144 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (129 citations). Ellen Schoof has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Estonia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Wolfgang Rascher, Jörg Dötsch, Katharina von der Hardt, Michael A. Kandler, Jörg Dötsch, W. Frobenius, Michael Kirschbaum, H. G. Dörr, D. Wénzel and Ina Knerr. Their work appears in journals such as Hormone Research in Paediatrics, European Journal of Endocrinology, Pediatric Research, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism and Growth Hormone & IGF Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact