Elizabeth E. Puscheck

128 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Peers

Elizabeth E. Puscheck
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
  • Reproductive Medicine 992
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 696
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 945
  • Aging 62
  • Family Practice 54
Replace Xu Ma with:
Xu Ma China
Verónica Mericq Chile
Victor Y. Fujimoto United States
Donatella Caserta Italy
Chris M.G. Thomas Netherlands
Roberto Marci Italy
Abel López‐Bermejo Spain
Helen Roberts New Zealand
Alan H. DeCherney United States
Jean Calleja‐Agius Malta
Elizabeth E. Puscheck relative to Xu Ma China Xu Ma's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Xu Ma · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth E. Puscheck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth E. Puscheck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth E. Puscheck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth E. Puscheck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth E. Puscheck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth E. Puscheck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth E. Puscheck. The network helps show where Elizabeth E. Puscheck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Elizabeth E. Puscheck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Elizabeth E. Puscheck Line = papers co-authored together Elizabeth E. Puscheck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 130 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991462
2 2010218
3 2008213
4 2007127
5 2020127
6 2008109
7 2011104
8 201499
9 201092
10 200685
11 201080
12 200875
13 200774
14 200970
15 200469
16 200769
17 201566
18 200557
19 200754
20 200352

About Elizabeth E. Puscheck

Elizabeth E. Puscheck is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology, Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 130 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (30 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (20 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (14 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (13 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (11 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (10 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (9 papers) and Reproductive System and Pregnancy (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (992 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (696 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (945 citations), Aging (62 citations) and Family Practice (54 citations). Elizabeth E. Puscheck has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Daniel A. Rappolee, Michael P. Diamond, Awoniyi O. Awonuga, Julia J. Wirth, M.G. Rossano, Nigel Paneth, Rajasingam S. Jeyendran, Louis V. Avioli, D. Maggio and E Friedrich. Their work appears in journals such as Fertility and Sterility, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stem Cells and Development and Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact