Elinor Amit

19 papers receiving 801 citations

Peers

Elinor Amit
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Applied Psychology 279
  • General Decision Sciences 41
  • Marketing 175
  • Social Psychology 362
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 252
Replace Amy N. Dalton with:
Amy N. Dalton Hong Kong
Maferima Touré‐Tillery United States
Nitika Garg Australia
Liang Meng China
Steven Sweldens Netherlands
Vanessa K. Bohns United States
Elena Stephan Israel
Alison Jing Xu United States
Robin Tanner United States
Xiuping Li Singapore
Elinor Amit relative to Amy N. Dalton Hong Kong Amy N. Dalton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Amy N. Dalton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Elinor Amit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elinor Amit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elinor Amit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elinor Amit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elinor Amit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elinor Amit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elinor Amit. The network helps show where Elinor Amit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Elinor Amit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Elinor Amit Line = papers co-authored together Elinor Amit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2014203
2 2009174
3 2012152
4 201283
5 201446
6 201745
7 201235
8 201927
9 201425
10 201916
11 201812
12 201512
13 20228
14
How Do People Communicate with Others? The Effect of Psychological Distance on Preference for Visual and Verbal Means of Communication
20133
15 20163
16
Activation of ventral visual cortex supports distance representation
20122
17 20152
18
How People Judge Institutional Corruption
20211
19 20101

About Elinor Amit

Elinor Amit is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 850 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (4 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (3 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (3 papers) and Ethics in Business and Education (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (279 citations), General Decision Sciences (41 citations), Marketing (175 citations), Social Psychology (362 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (252 citations). Elinor Amit has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Yaacov Trope, Joshua D. Greene, Daniel Algom, Alison Ledgerwood, Courtney K. Soderberg, Annie O. Kochersberger, Shannon Callahan, Cheryl Wakslak, Kentaro Fujita and Evelina Fedorenko. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Brain and Cognition, Social Psychological and Personality Science, Journal of Memory and Language and Psychological Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact