Elena Becker

1.0k citations
10 papers · 874 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Elena Becker

10 papers receiving 857 citations

Peers

Elena Becker
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Developmental Neuroscience 91
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 308
  • Genetics 363
  • Cell Biology 159
  • Molecular Biology 520
Replace Sofija Kelič with:
Sofija Kelič United States
Teruyoshi Hirayama Japan
A. Stoykova Germany
Justyna A. Janas United States
Kay E. Davies United Kingdom
Takao Honda Japan
Wun‐Chey Sin Canada
Guoying Karen Yu United States
Xiang-Chun Ju China
Rodrigo A. P. Martins Brazil
Elena Becker relative to Sofija Kelič United States Sofija Kelič's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Sofija Kelič · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Elena Becker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elena Becker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elena Becker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elena Becker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elena Becker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elena Becker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elena Becker. The network helps show where Elena Becker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Elena Becker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Elena Becker Line = papers co-authored together Elena Becker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2005427
2 1999138
3 2000118
4 199957
5 199855
6 199855
7 19988
8 19988
9 19966
10
Cultural Authenticity and the Impacts of Cultural Tourism in Malaysian Borneo
20152

About Elena Becker

Elena Becker is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Developmental Neuroscience, Cell Biology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 10 papers that have together received 874 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nerve injury and regeneration (5 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers), Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling (3 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (1 paper), Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (1 paper), Asian Culture and Media Studies (1 paper), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (1 paper) and Melanoma and MAPK Pathways (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (91 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (308 citations), Genetics (363 citations), Cell Biology (159 citations) and Molecular Biology (520 citations). Elena Becker has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Edward Y. Skolnik, Hongzhi Liu, Yichi Su, Jessica E. Treisman, Jim Grigsby, David Hessl, Claudia Greco, Alan K. Chang, Robert F. Berman and Richard M. Martin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Current Biology, Molecular and Cellular Biology and Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact