Eimear M. Smith

36 papers receiving 759 citations

Peers

Eimear M. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 229
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 58
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 136
  • Occupational Therapy 34
  • Rehabilitation 31
Replace Mark Delargy with:
Mark Delargy United Kingdom
Steve R. Woby United Kingdom
Judith A. Bell-Krotoski United States
Anthony Gélis France
Randall E. Keyser United States
Isabella Schwartz Israel
Ton A.R. Schreuders Netherlands
Fatemeh Ehsani Iran
Jong-Moon Hwang South Korea
Thomas Galski United States
Eimear M. Smith relative to Mark Delargy United Kingdom Mark Delargy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Mark Delargy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eimear M. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eimear M. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eimear M. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eimear M. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eimear M. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eimear M. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eimear M. Smith. The network helps show where Eimear M. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eimear M. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eimear M. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Eimear M. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005323
2 201243
3 201541
4 200939
5 201937
6 201333
7 201532
8 202230
9 201626
10 201324
11 202024
12 201021
13 200720
14 201819
15 202017
16 201114
17 201713
18 20148
19 20198
20 20117

About Eimear M. Smith

Eimear M. Smith is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, General Health Professions, Pharmacology and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, having authored 36 papers that have together received 816 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (19 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (6 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (2 papers), Medical Practices and Rehabilitation (2 papers), Spinal Hematomas and Complications (1 paper) and Emergency and Acute Care Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (229 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (58 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (136 citations), Occupational Therapy (34 citations) and Rehabilitation (31 citations). Eimear M. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mark Delargy, Catherine Maria Comiskey, Áine M. Carroll, Marcel W. M. Post, Giorgio Scivoletto, Peter W. New, Andrea F. Townson, Inge Eriks Hoogland, Anupam Gupta and Ronald K. Reeves. Their work appears in journals such as Spinal Cord, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Disability and Rehabilitation, Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation and PM&R.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact