Peter W. New

120 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Peter W. New
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.5k
  • Rehabilitation 224
  • Occupational Therapy 87
  • Emergency Medicine 142
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 213
Replace Andrew J. Haig with:
Andrew J. Haig United States
Richard A. Deyo United States
Julie Gassaway United States
William McKinley United States
Andrea C. Skelly United States
Susan Charlifue United States
Rhonda M. Williams United States
Janet K. Freburger United States
Shaun O’Leary Australia
Andrew A. Guccione United States
Peter W. New relative to Andrew J. Haig United States Andrew J. Haig's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Andrew J. Haig · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter W. New

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter W. New's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter W. New with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter W. New more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter W. New

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter W. New. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter W. New. The network helps show where Peter W. New may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter W. New, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter W. New Line = papers co-authored together Peter W. New links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 121 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010166
2 2017136
3 2007121
4 200299
5 201398
6 200575
7 200571
8 201071
9 200865
10 198964
11 200362
12 199760
13 201056
14 200954
15 201654
16 201050
17 201447
18 201944
19 198244
20 201241

About Peter W. New

Peter W. New is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Rehabilitation, Psychiatry and Mental health and Epidemiology, having authored 121 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (63 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (11 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (8 papers), Management of metastatic bone disease (4 papers), Disability Rights and Representation (4 papers), Elder Abuse and Neglect (4 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (3 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.5k citations), Rehabilitation (224 citations), Occupational Therapy (87 citations), Emergency Medicine (142 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (213 citations). Peter W. New has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Fin Biering‐Sørensen, Vijaya Sundararajan, Michael J. DeVivo, Ruth Marshall, Michael Bailey, Hyam Barry Rawicki, Marcel W. M. Post, Christine Migliorini, Farooq Azam Rathore and Vanessa K. Noonan. Their work appears in journals such as Spinal Cord, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, The Medical Journal of Australia and Disability and Rehabilitation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact