E.H.J. Weil
Impact in
- Urology top 0.2%
- Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
- Urological Disorders and Treatments
- Rheumatology top 0.5%
- Pelvic floor disorders treatments
Papers in
- Urology 20
- Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research 19
- Rheumatology 20
- Pelvic floor disorders treatments 19
- Co-authors
- R.A. Janknegt (8 shared papers)Rob A. de Bie (9 shared papers)Pedro Eerdmans (4 shared papers)Wout Scheepens (9 shared papers)P.E.V. Van Kerrebroeck (5 shared papers)Dennis Oerlemans (5 shared papers)A.C. van Voskuilen (4 shared papers)J.L. Ruiz-Cerdá (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- European Urology (7 papers)The Journal of Urology (6 papers)Urology (4 papers)World Journal of Urology (2 papers)Neurourology and Urodynamics (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsSpainSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
E.H.J. Weil
34 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Urology 1.1k
- Rheumatology 1.1k
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 77
- Gastroenterology 66
- Surgery 498
Countries citing papers authored by E.H.J. Weil
This map shows the geographic impact of E.H.J. Weil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E.H.J. Weil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E.H.J. Weil more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E.H.J. Weil
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E.H.J. Weil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E.H.J. Weil. The network helps show where E.H.J. Weil may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside E.H.J. Weil, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 151 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 141 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 108 | |
| 4 | 1996 | 108 | |
| 5 | 1998 | 99 | |
| 6 | 2002 | 82 | |
| 7 | 1993 | 81 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 76 | |
| 9 | 2001 | 68 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 62 | |
| 11 | 2002 | 60 | |
| 12 | 2006 | 58 | |
| 13 | 1992 | 35 | |
| 14 | 1988 | 32 | |
| 15 | 2003 | 29 | |
| 16 | 1993 | 22 | |
| 17 | 1998 | 21 | |
| 18 | 2011 | 21 | |
| 19 | 1995 | 20 | |
| 20 | 2005 | 18 |
About E.H.J. Weil
E.H.J. Weil is a scholar working on Urology, Rheumatology, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Neurology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (19 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (19 papers), Pain Management and Treatment (6 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (5 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (4 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (3 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (1.1k citations), Rheumatology (1.1k citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (77 citations), Gastroenterology (66 citations) and Surgery (498 citations). E.H.J. Weil has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Spain and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include R.A. Janknegt, Rob A. de Bie, Pedro Eerdmans, Wout Scheepens, P.E.V. Van Kerrebroeck, Dennis Oerlemans, A.C. van Voskuilen, J.L. Ruiz-Cerdá, Philip E.V.A. van Kerrebroeck and Gommert A. van Koeveringe. Their work appears in journals such as European Urology, The Journal of Urology, Urology, World Journal of Urology and Neurourology and Urodynamics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.