Edwin M. Good
Impact in
- Religious studies top 1%
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies
- Development top 10%
- Development, Ethics, and Society
Papers in
-
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation 16
-
- Archaeology and Historical Studies 8
- Ancient Near East History 2
- Co-authors
- Adele Berlin (1 shared paper)David Robertson (1 shared paper)George W. Coats (1 shared paper)Walter E. Rast (1 shared paper)Norman Habel (1 shared paper)Martin Buss (1 shared paper)G. Ernest Wright (1 shared paper)Cyril Ehrlich (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Biblical Literature (13 papers)Vetus Testamentum (4 papers)Stanford Law Review (1 paper)Technology and Culture (1 paper)Journal of the American Academy of Religion (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Edwin M. Good
21 papers receiving 78 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Religious studies 105
- Development 21
- Archeology 57
- Philosophy 21
- Music 4
Countries citing papers authored by Edwin M. Good
This map shows the geographic impact of Edwin M. Good's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwin M. Good with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwin M. Good more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edwin M. Good
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwin M. Good. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwin M. Good. The network helps show where Edwin M. Good may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Edwin M. Good, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1986 | 68 | |
| 2 | Irony in the Old Testament | 1981 | 12 |
| 3 | 1973 | 10 | |
| 4 | 1979 | 9 | |
| 5 | 1967 | 8 | |
| 6 | 1978 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 5 | |
| 8 | 1966 | 4 | |
| 9 | Ezekiel's ship: Some extended metaphors in the Old Testament | 1970 | 3 |
| 10 | 1958 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1978 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1970 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1970 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1978 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1963 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1964 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1966 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1985 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1982 | 1 |
About Edwin M. Good
Edwin M. Good is a scholar working on Religious studies, Archeology, Sociology and Political Science, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Music, having authored 25 papers that have together received 147 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (16 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (8 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (7 papers), Ancient Near East History (2 papers), Musicology and Musical Analysis (2 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (2 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (1 paper) and Islamic Studies and History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (105 citations), Development (21 citations), Archeology (57 citations), Philosophy (21 citations) and Music (4 citations). Edwin M. Good has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Adele Berlin, David Robertson, George W. Coats, Walter E. Rast, Norman Habel, Martin Buss, G. Ernest Wright, Cyril Ehrlich, Robert Winter and Michael Cole. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biblical Literature, Vetus Testamentum, Stanford Law Review, Technology and Culture and Journal of the American Academy of Religion.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.