Edwin M. Good

541 citations
24 papers · 124 · h-index 5

Impact in

    • Biblical Studies and Interpretation
    • Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies
  • Development top 10%
    • Development, Ethics, and Society

Papers in

    • Biblical Studies and Interpretation 15
    • Archaeology and Historical Studies 7
    • Ancient Near East History 2
    • Ancient Egypt and Archaeology 1

Edwin M. Good

20 papers receiving 65 citations

Peers

Edwin M. Good
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Religious studies 94
  • Development 19
  • Archeology 51
  • Philosophy 17
  • Sociology and Political Science 47
Replace J.P. Fokkelman with:
J.P. Fokkelman
James Muilenburg United States
Robert C. Tannehill United States
Isaac Rabinowitz United States
Neil Elliott
George M. Landes United States
J. Alberto Soggin
Norman Perrin United States
Ziony Zevit United States
Jouette M. Bassler United States
Edwin M. Good relative to J.P. Fokkelman J.P. Fokkelman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
J.P. Fokkelman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edwin M. Good

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edwin M. Good's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwin M. Good with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwin M. Good more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edwin M. Good

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwin M. Good. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwin M. Good. The network helps show where Edwin M. Good may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Edwin M. Good, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edwin M. Good Line = papers co-authored together Edwin M. Good links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198662
2
Irony in the Old Testament
198112
3 19798
4 19736
5 19675
6 19664
7 19783
8
Ezekiel's ship: Some extended metaphors in the Old Testament
19703
9 19582
10 19782
11 19782
12 19632
13 19702
14 19702
15 19642
16 20021
17 19851
18 19661
19 20111
20 19821

About Edwin M. Good

Edwin M. Good is a scholar working on Religious studies, Archeology, Sociology and Political Science, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Music, having authored 24 papers that have together received 124 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (15 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (7 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (6 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (2 papers), Musicology and Musical Analysis (2 papers), Ancient Near East History (2 papers), Islamic Studies and History (1 paper) and Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (94 citations), Development (19 citations), Archeology (51 citations), Philosophy (17 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (47 citations). Edwin M. Good has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Adele Berlin, David Robertson, Norman Habel, Walter E. Rast, G. Ernest Wright, Martin Buss, George W. Coats, Robert Winter, Michael Cole and Cyril Ehrlich. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biblical Literature, Vetus Testamentum, Stanford Law Review, Journal of the American Academy of Religion and Technology and Culture.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact