Edwin J. Green

43 papers receiving 520 citations

Peers

Edwin J. Green
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 330
  • Environmental Engineering 188
  • Global and Planetary Change 252
  • Statistics and Probability 93
  • Insect Science 62
Replace Paul C. Van Deusen with:
Paul C. Van Deusen United States
G. B. Wood Australia
Benee F. Swindel United States
Chuangmin Liu Canada
Francis A. Roesch United States
W. L. Hafley United States
L. R. Grosenbaugh United States
Oscar Garcı́a Canada
Juha Lappi Finland
Robert F. Dale United States
Edwin J. Green relative to Paul C. Van Deusen United States Paul C. Van Deusen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Paul C. Van Deusen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edwin J. Green

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edwin J. Green's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwin J. Green with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwin J. Green more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edwin J. Green

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwin J. Green. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwin J. Green. The network helps show where Edwin J. Green may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edwin J. Green, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edwin J. Green Line = papers co-authored together Edwin J. Green links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201462
2 198451
3 200047
4 199942
5 199441
6 199137
7 198535
8 200025
9 201124
10 200219
11 199619
12 198918
13 200316
14 202013
15 198511
16
An Alternative View of Forest Sampling
199311
17 199210
18 202010
19 19919
20 19779

About Edwin J. Green

Edwin J. Green is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology and Statistics and Probability, having authored 45 papers that have together received 606 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (25 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (13 papers), Forest Management and Policy (8 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (4 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (4 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (4 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers) and Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (330 citations), Environmental Engineering (188 citations), Global and Planetary Change (252 citations), Statistics and Probability (93 citations) and Insect Science (62 citations). Edwin J. Green has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include William E. Strawderman, David D. Reed, David W. MacFarlane, Harry T. Valentine, Francis A. Roesch, Harold E. Burkhart, Charles T. Scott, George C. Hamilton, A. F. M. Smith and Anne L. Nielsen. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Science, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Ecological Modelling, Northern Journal of Applied Forestry and Journal of the American Statistical Association.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact