Edna Rödig

1.4k citations
9 papers · 822 · 1 hit paper · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Edna Rödig

9 papers receiving 818 citations

Edna Rödig's Hit Papers

Global patterns of tropical forest fragmentation 2018 · 429 citations
4290+2+5Years since publication100200300400

Peers

Edna Rödig
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 406
  • Global and Planetary Change 480
  • Ecological Modeling 86
  • Ecology 306
  • Environmental Engineering 149
Replace Mateus Dantas de Paula with:
Mateus Dantas de Paula Germany
A. Huth Germany
Carlos Portillo‐Quintero United States
François Morneau France
Stéphane Guitet France
Thomas J. Brandeis United States
Juan C. Álvarez‐Yépiz Mexico
Amanda Uowolo United States
Grace Nangendo United Kingdom
Isabelle Maréchaux France
Edna Rödig relative to Mateus Dantas de Paula Germany Mateus Dantas de Paula's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Mateus Dantas de Paula · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edna Rödig

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edna Rödig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edna Rödig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edna Rödig more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edna Rödig

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edna Rödig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edna Rödig. The network helps show where Edna Rödig may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edna Rödig, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edna Rödig Line = papers co-authored together Edna Rödig links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1
Global patterns of tropical forest fragmentation
Hit paper breakdown →
2018429
2 2016113
3 201879
4 201764
5 202156
6 201939
7 201721
8 201819
9 20222

About Edna Rödig

Edna Rödig is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Environmental Engineering, Ecology and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 9 papers that have together received 822 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (6 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (4 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (3 papers), Remote Sensing in Agriculture (2 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (1 paper), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (1 paper) and Climate variability and models (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (406 citations), Global and Planetary Change (480 citations), Ecological Modeling (86 citations), Ecology (306 citations) and Environmental Engineering (149 citations). Edna Rödig has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Huth, Rico Fischer, Franziska Taubert, Sebastian Lehmann, Jürgen Groeneveld, Thorsten Wiegand, Michael S. Müller, Matthias Cuntz, Anja Rammig and Friedrich J. Bohn. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Environmental Research Letters, Forest Ecosystems, Nature and Forests.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact