Edna Brown

1.4k citations
30 papers · 844 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Edna Brown

29 papers receiving 789 citations

Peers

Edna Brown
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Health 309
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 29
  • Demography 218
  • Social Psychology 328
  • Sociology and Political Science 461
Replace Arthur M. Shapiro with:
Arthur M. Shapiro United States
James David Lambert United States
Heather M. Helms United States
Pamela S. Webster United States
Sanghee Chun Canada
Karen Pugliesi United States
Megan Gilligan United States
Shirley Huck United States
Victoria Hilkevitch Bedford United States
Jeffrey E. Stokes United States
Edna Brown relative to Arthur M. Shapiro United States Arthur M. Shapiro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Arthur M. Shapiro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edna Brown

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edna Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edna Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edna Brown more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edna Brown

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edna Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edna Brown. The network helps show where Edna Brown may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edna Brown, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edna Brown Line = papers co-authored together Edna Brown links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013230
2 2006109
3 201092
4 200887
5 201154
6 201244
7 201124
8 201322
9 201721
10 200719
11 201816
12 201415
13 201615
14 200810
15 20129
16 20129
17 20219
18
SUPERPAVE CONSTRUCTION ISSUES AND EARLY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
19999
19 20118
20 20225

About Edna Brown

Edna Brown is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Demography, Social Psychology, Health and General Health Professions, having authored 30 papers that have together received 844 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (15 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (14 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (11 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (4 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (4 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (4 papers) and Family Support in Illness (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (309 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (29 citations), Demography (218 citations), Social Psychology (328 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (461 citations). Edna Brown has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Türkiye and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Terri L. Orbuch, Robert Joseph Taylor, Linda M. Chatters, Amanda Toler Woodward, Kira S. Birditt, José A. Bauermeister, Katherine L. Fiori, Toni C. Antonucci, Kai S. Cortina and Jessica M. McIlvane. Their work appears in journals such as Family Relations, Research in Human Development, Journal of African American Studies, Infant Mental Health Journal and Journal of Marriage and the Family.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact