Research in Human Development

391 papers and 9.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 391 papers published in Research in Human Development in the last decades have received a total of 9.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Research in Human Development usually cover Sociology and Political Science (149 papers), Clinical Psychology (118 papers) and Social Psychology (108 papers) specifically the topics of Early Childhood Education and Development (67 papers), Role of Positive Emotions in Well-Being (53 papers) and Youth Development and Social Support (44 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Research in Human Development are Kristopher J. Preacher, James P. Selig, Martin Kohli, Lesa Hoffman, Nilàm Ram, Robert S. Stawski, Karl Ulrich Mayer, Alexandra M. Freund, Dan P. McAdams and Richard A. Settersten.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Research in Human Development

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Research in Human Development. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Research in Human Development.

Countries where authors publish in Research in Human Development

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Research in Human Development. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Research in Human Development with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Research in Human Development more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025