Edith Motschall

65 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

Edith Motschall
Comparison fields: 5 of 159
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 138
  • Orthodontics 188
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 203
  • Oncology 423
  • Hepatology 156
Replace Lydia Masako Ferreira with:
Lydia Masako Ferreira Brazil
Deborah M. Winn United States
Francisco Garcia Rio Spain
Omar Kujan Australia
Basil C. Tarlatzis Greece
Linlu Ma China
Catherine Smith United Kingdom
Say Beng Tan Singapore
Junko Tanaka Japan
Staffan Lindblad Sweden
Edith Motschall relative to Lydia Masako Ferreira Brazil Lydia Masako Ferreira's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×31.2×
Lydia Masako Ferreira · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edith Motschall

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edith Motschall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edith Motschall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edith Motschall more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edith Motschall

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edith Motschall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edith Motschall. The network helps show where Edith Motschall may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edith Motschall, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edith Motschall Line = papers co-authored together Edith Motschall links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010275
2 2017255
3 2009175
4 2013173
5 2011158
6 2011136
7 2014129
8 2008114
9 2013111
10 2013107
11 200488
12 200783
13 201474
14 201471
15 200465
16 201863
17 201963
18 201362
19 200560
20 200759

About Edith Motschall

Edith Motschall is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Complementary and Manual Therapy, General Health Professions, Genetics and Hepatology, having authored 71 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (24 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (3 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (3 papers), Temporomandibular Joint Disorders (3 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (3 papers), Information Retrieval and Search Behavior (3 papers), Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (2 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and Manual Therapy (138 citations), Orthodontics (188 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (203 citations), Oncology (423 citations) and Hepatology (156 citations). Edith Motschall has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Joerg J Meerpohl, Jens C. Türp, Nuh N. Rahbari, Jürgen Weitz, Werner Vach, Gerta Rücker, Markus Wolfgang Büchler, Moritz Koch, Martin Wendland Christian Boeker and Gerd Antes. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Systematic Reviews, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, BMJ Open and Annals of Surgical Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact