Edith Law

68 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Edith Law
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Computer Science Applications 554
  • Ecological Modeling 90
  • Signal Processing 237
  • Health Informatics 54
  • Human-Computer Interaction 122
Replace Alan Chamberlain with:
Alan Chamberlain United Kingdom
Paul Roe Australia
Jane Hunter Australia
Andrew McGregor Olney United States
Kevin Bretonnel Cohen United States
Jeehyung Lee United States
J. Barbero Spain
Alex C. Williams United States
Peter Wittenburg Germany
Wayne Ward United States
Edith Law relative to Alan Chamberlain United Kingdom Alan Chamberlain's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×18×
Alan Chamberlain · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edith Law

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edith Law's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edith Law with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edith Law more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edith Law

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edith Law. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edith Law. The network helps show where Edith Law may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edith Law, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edith Law Line = papers co-authored together Edith Law links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 73 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009201
2 2007149
3 2012130
4 2018105
5 200991
6 201171
7 201669
8 202066
9 201756
10 201754
11 201750
12 201948
13 201145
14 201845
15 201941
16 201338
17 201937
18 202036
19 201931
20 202229

About Edith Law

Edith Law is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Social Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing and Information Systems, having authored 73 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing (22 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (10 papers), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (7 papers), Information Retrieval and Search Behavior (5 papers), Music and Audio Processing (5 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (4 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (3 papers) and Research Data Management Practices (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (554 citations), Ecological Modeling (90 citations), Signal Processing (237 citations), Health Informatics (54 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (122 citations). Edith Law has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Luis von Ahn, Alex C. Williams, Joslin Goh, Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Roger B. Dannenberg, Haoqi Zhang, Kate S. Larson, Mike Schaekermann, Eric Horvitz and Sangho Suh. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Synthesis lectures on artificial intelligence and machine learning, AI Magazine, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact