Daniel B. Hoch

2.4k citations
58 papers · 1.6k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel B. Hoch

57 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Daniel B. Hoch
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 633
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 290
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 275
  • Neurology 205
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 237
Replace Oriano Mecarelli with:
Oriano Mecarelli Italy
Bernd Pohlmann‐Eden Germany
Kandavel Thennarasu India
Phil E M Smith United Kingdom
Janis L. Breeze United States
Khara M. Sauro Canada
Zachary M. Grinspan United States
Mohammed M. Jan Saudi Arabia
Aylin Y. Reid Canada
David M. Ficker United States
Daniel B. Hoch relative to Oriano Mecarelli Italy Oriano Mecarelli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Oriano Mecarelli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel B. Hoch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel B. Hoch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel B. Hoch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel B. Hoch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel B. Hoch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel B. Hoch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel B. Hoch. The network helps show where Daniel B. Hoch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel B. Hoch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel B. Hoch Line = papers co-authored together Daniel B. Hoch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996176
2 2020116
3 2018105
4 2014101
5 201978
6 199171
7 200967
8 197861
9 201458
10 201258
11 200540
12 201737
13 198636
14 199335
15 199933
16 200431
17 199630
18 201230
19 202030
20 200429

About Daniel B. Hoch

Daniel B. Hoch is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Neurology, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epilepsy research and treatment (22 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (7 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (5 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (3 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (3 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (2 papers) and Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (633 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (290 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (275 citations), Neurology (205 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (237 citations). Daniel B. Hoch has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Andrew J. Cole, Bernd Pohlmann‐Eden, Jeffrey I. Cochius, Sydney S. Cash, M. Brandon Westover, Keith H. Chiappa, Lidia M.V.R. Moura, R.D. Myers, Mouhsin M. Shafi and Raymond Dingledine. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Epilepsy Research, Epilepsy & Behavior, Seizure and Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact