Edith A. Widder

4.1k citations
70 papers · 3.0k · h-index 31

Impact in

Papers in

Edith A. Widder

70 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

Edith A. Widder
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 839
  • Oceanography 549
  • Biophysics 233
  • Ecology 881
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 414
Replace James F. Case with:
James F. Case United States
Garrett M. Odell United States
Peter J. Herring United Kingdom
James S. Clegg United States
James G. Morin United States
Thorsten Burmester Germany
Christian Sardet France
Kazuo Inaba Japan
Christian Bock Germany
Anya Salih Australia
Edith A. Widder relative to James F. Case United States James F. Case's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
James F. Case · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edith A. Widder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edith A. Widder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edith A. Widder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edith A. Widder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edith A. Widder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edith A. Widder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edith A. Widder. The network helps show where Edith A. Widder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edith A. Widder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edith A. Widder Line = papers co-authored together Edith A. Widder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010363
2 2004332
3 2006172
4 2005118
5 1999112
6 1983111
7 199798
8 198587
9 198470
10 200467
11 200164
12 199961
13 200857
14 199957
15 200256
16 198956
17 199749
18 199849
19 199848
20 200543

About Edith A. Widder

Edith A. Widder is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Oceanography, Ecology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 70 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include bioluminescence and chemiluminescence research (22 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (18 papers), Cephalopods and Marine Biology (16 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (15 papers), Marine and coastal ecosystems (10 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (10 papers), Marine Biology and Ecology Research (9 papers) and Marine and fisheries research (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (839 citations), Oceanography (549 citations), Biophysics (233 citations), Ecology (881 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (414 citations). Edith A. Widder has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Tamara M. Frank, Sönke Johnsen, James F. Case, J. F. Case, Michael I. Latz, Peter J. Herring, Bruce H. Robison, Kim R. Reisenbichler, Mikhail V. Matz and S. H. D. Haddock. Their work appears in journals such as Marine Biology, Biological Bulletin, Journal of Comparative Physiology A, Journal of Plankton Research and Journal of Experimental Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact