Ed Brook
Impact in
- Atmospheric Science top 10%
- Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
- Cryospheric studies and observations
- Climate change and permafrost
- Environmental Chemistry top 10%
- Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Papers in
-
- Geology and Paleoclimatology Research 5
- Cryospheric studies and observations 4
-
- Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics 3
- Co-authors
- Thomas Blunier (3 shared papers)J. Chappellaz (2 shared papers)Bruno Malaizé (1 shared paper)Todd Sowers (2 shared papers)L. Mitchell (1 shared paper)Christo Buizert (2 shared papers)James E. Lee (1 shared paper)Paul A. Mayewski (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (2 papers)Nature (1 paper)Geophysical Research Letters (1 paper)Science (1 paper)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaJapan
In The Last Decade
Ed Brook
6 papers receiving 274 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Atmospheric Science 264
- Environmental Chemistry 68
- Anthropology 37
- Global and Planetary Change 75
- Ecology 89
Countries citing papers authored by Ed Brook
This map shows the geographic impact of Ed Brook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ed Brook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ed Brook more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ed Brook
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ed Brook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ed Brook. The network helps show where Ed Brook may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ed Brook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 100 | |
| 2 | 1997 | 83 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 67 | |
| 4 | 1997 | 33 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 1 |
About Ed Brook
Ed Brook is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Geophysics, Environmental Chemistry and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 7 papers that have together received 294 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (5 papers), Cryospheric studies and observations (4 papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (3 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (2 papers), Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena (2 papers), Global Energy and Sustainability Research (1 paper), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (1 paper) and Polar Research and Ecology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (264 citations), Environmental Chemistry (68 citations), Anthropology (37 citations), Global and Planetary Change (75 citations) and Ecology (89 citations). Ed Brook has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Blunier, J. Chappellaz, Bruno Malaizé, Todd Sowers, L. Mitchell, Christo Buizert, James E. Lee, Paul A. Mayewski, John A. Higgins and Nicole Spaulding. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Nature, Geophysical Research Letters, Science and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.