Eaaron Henderson‐King

15 papers receiving 801 citations

Peers

Eaaron Henderson‐King
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Clinical Psychology 388
  • Marketing 148
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 159
  • Gender Studies 97
  • Social Psychology 206
Replace Carole N. Hodge with:
Carole N. Hodge United States
Robert N. Kilcullen United States
Maureen Crowley United States
Angie Williams United Kingdom
Steve A. Nida United States
Angela G. Pirlott United States
Don Munro Australia
Peter Nikken Netherlands
Camille S. Johnson United States
Joel T. Johnson United States
Eaaron Henderson‐King relative to Carole N. Hodge United States Carole N. Hodge's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Carole N. Hodge · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eaaron Henderson‐King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eaaron Henderson‐King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eaaron Henderson‐King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eaaron Henderson‐King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eaaron Henderson‐King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eaaron Henderson‐King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eaaron Henderson‐King. The network helps show where Eaaron Henderson‐King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Eaaron Henderson‐King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eaaron Henderson‐King Line = papers co-authored together Eaaron Henderson‐King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2005268
2 1999118
3 1997108
4 199679
5 200169
6 199459
7 199742
8 199735
9 200432
10 199924
11 200217
12 201513
13
Group Favoritism and Support for Government Policies as a Function of Patriotic Orientation and Perceived Threat
20095
14 19945
15 19965
16 19991

About Eaaron Henderson‐King

Eaaron Henderson‐King is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Gender Studies, having authored 16 papers that have together received 880 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (5 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers), Psychology of Social Influence (3 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (3 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (2 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (2 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (388 citations), Marketing (148 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (159 citations), Gender Studies (97 citations) and Social Psychology (206 citations). Eaaron Henderson‐King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mozambique and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Donna Henderson‐King, Richard E. Nisbett, Emil J. Posavac, Yolanda Suarez‐Balcazar, Fred B. Bryant, R. Scott Tindale, Linda Heath, Judith Myers, John S. Edwards and John Richard Edwards. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Journal of Applied Social Psychology and Group Processes & Intergroup Relations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact