E. Silk
Impact in
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 10%
- Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Papers in
-
- Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases 5
-
- Enzyme function and inhibition 2
- Co-authors
- H. Lehmann (10 shared papers)J. Liddell (1 shared paper)M. Whittaker (3 shared papers)Mary Whittaker (1 shared paper)John King (1 shared paper)H. Harris (2 shared papers)L. Chapman (6 shared papers)L.W. Hall (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Lancet (3 papers)Clinica Chimica Acta (3 papers)BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (3 papers)British Journal of Haematology (2 papers)Human Heredity (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomJamaicaCanada
In The Last Decade
E. Silk
22 papers receiving 420 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Pharmacology 252
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 47
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 101
- Pharmacology 40
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 31
Countries citing papers authored by E. Silk
This map shows the geographic impact of E. Silk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Silk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Silk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E. Silk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Silk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Silk. The network helps show where E. Silk may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside E. Silk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1962 | 146 | |
| 2 | 1979 | 54 | |
| 3 | 1960 | 50 | |
| 4 | 1953 | 48 | |
| 5 | 1953 | 40 | |
| 6 | 1953 | 36 | |
| 7 | 1953 | 19 | |
| 8 | 1971 | 18 | |
| 9 | 1960 | 15 | |
| 10 | 1968 | 14 | |
| 11 | 1954 | 14 | |
| 12 | 1965 | 13 | |
| 13 | 1960 | 12 | |
| 14 | 1973 | 11 | |
| 15 | 1974 | 8 | |
| 16 | 1952 | 7 | |
| 17 | 1976 | 7 | |
| 18 | 1975 | 6 | |
| 19 | 1972 | 6 | |
| 20 | 1970 | 3 |
About E. Silk
E. Silk is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Molecular Biology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Surgery, having authored 24 papers that have together received 534 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (5 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (2 papers), Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (2 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (2 papers), Enzyme function and inhibition (2 papers), Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases (2 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (2 papers) and Folate and B Vitamins Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (252 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (47 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (101 citations), Pharmacology (40 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (31 citations). E. Silk has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Jamaica and Canada. Frequent co-authors include H. Lehmann, J. Liddell, M. Whittaker, Mary Whittaker, John King, H. Harris, L. Chapman, L.W. Hall, L Kaufman and A Skupny. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Clinica Chimica Acta, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, British Journal of Haematology and Human Heredity.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.