Berit Hølund

48 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Berit Hølund
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Reproductive Medicine 352
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 281
  • Immunology and Allergy 66
  • Hepatology 83
  • Oncology 268
Replace Eisei Ishikawa with:
Eisei Ishikawa Japan
Darren Wheeler United States
M. Apaja‐Sarkkinen Finland
Frank Vellios United States
James Nicklin Australia
Shigeo Aizawa Japan
J. F. M. Delemarre Netherlands
D. Pectasides Greece
Alexander W. Miller United States
Adam Pawinski Norway
Berit Hølund relative to Eisei Ishikawa Japan Eisei Ishikawa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Eisei Ishikawa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Berit Hølund

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Berit Hølund's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Berit Hølund with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Berit Hølund more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Berit Hølund

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Berit Hølund. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Berit Hølund. The network helps show where Berit Hølund may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Berit Hølund, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Berit Hølund Line = papers co-authored together Berit Hølund links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993120
2 2004118
3 1980108
4
Analysis of cervical smears obtained within three years of the diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer.
199178
5 198076
6 201170
7 198369
8 198364
9 198257
10 200046
11 200745
12 199642
13 197941
14 199341
15 199637
16 199936
17 199535
18 199131
19 199329
20
Efficacy of the cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells.
199027

About Berit Hølund

Berit Hølund is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, Surgery and Cancer Research, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (12 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (9 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (6 papers), Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (4 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (3 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms (3 papers) and Uterine Myomas and Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (352 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (281 citations), Immunology and Allergy (66 citations), Hepatology (83 citations) and Oncology (268 citations). Berit Hølund has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Sweden and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include K. Bertelsen, Helle Harding Poulsen, P. Schlichting, Inge Clemmensen, Anders Jakobsen, Gunnar B. Kristensen, Erik Jakobsen, Jens Steen Nielsen, Peter Junker and R. Bach Andersen. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Placenta, Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology and European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact